无色天然蓝宝石与合成蓝宝石的微量元素及光谱学特征

Identification Methods of Colourless Natural and Synthetic Sapphires

  • 摘要: 无色天然蓝宝石以其明亮的强光泽和高透明度,成为市场上广受欢迎的无色宝石。目前市场上存在大量以无色合成蓝宝石冒充天然蓝宝石的现象,且内部纯净者在常规仪器下很难区分。本研究通过常规鉴定方法、X射线荧光光谱仪(EDXRF) 和激光剥蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱仪(LA-ICP-MS)等测试仪器对无色天然与合成蓝宝石样品进行系统对比研究。结果表明,约70%无色天然蓝宝石样品在长波紫外灯(365 nm)下呈强至弱的红色、橙色荧光以及蓝白荧光,内部包裹体常见愈合裂隙、小晶体等,而无色合成蓝宝石样品则均呈荧光惰性,且内部极少见包裹体。LA-ICP-MS结果表明,无色天然与合成蓝宝石样品在微量元素含量和种类上差异显著,Ga和Fe的区分更为明显。天然样品中Ga元素质量分数为10.0~141.6 μg/g,Fe元素为109.0~2 225.0 μg/g,而合成样品中Ga、Fe元素质量分数均低于检出限。拉曼光谱结果表明,天然与合成样品均显示417 cm-1附近的拉曼散射峰,但该峰的半高宽存在明显差异。合成样品的半高宽值均≤2.35 cm-1,天然样品均≥ 2.42 cm-1。在532 nm激发光源下,两者均出现693.3 nm和694.4 nm的发光峰,峰位一致,但合成样品的发光强度低于天然样品。综合上述结果,本研究提出了以常规仪器初步筛选、EDXRF及LA-ICP-MS测试微量元素为重点、拉曼光谱及光致发光光谱强度为辅助的鉴定流程,可为无色蓝宝石的准确鉴定提供参考依据。

     

    Abstract: Colourless natural sapphire, known for its bright luster and high transparency, is popular in the gemstone market. However, colourless synthetic sapphires are frequently sold as natural sapphires, and internally clean stones are difficult to distinguish natural from synthetic ones using conventional methods. In this study, systematic comparative investigation of colourless natural and synthetic sapphire samples is conducted using the conventional gemmological tests, energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF), and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). The results show that approximately 70% of the colourless natural sapphire samples exhibit weak to strong red, orange or blue-white fluorescence under long-wave ultraviolet light (365 nm), with common inclusions such as healed fissures and small crystals. In contrast, all colourless synthetic sapphire samples are non-fluorescent and rarely contain inclusions. LA-ICP-MS results reveal significant differences in both the concentrations and types of trace elements between colourless natural and synthetic sapphires, with Ga and Fe being the most discriminative elements. Natural samples contain 10.0-141.6 μg/g Ga and 109.0-2 225.0 μg/g Fe elements, whereas both Ga and Fe in synthetic samples are below the detection limit. Raman spectraanalysis indicates that both natural and synthetic samples display a scattering peak near 417 cm-1, but the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of this peak differs markedly: the FWHM of synthetic samples are all ≤ 2.35 cm-1, while those of natural samples are all ≥ 2.42 cm-1. Under 532 nm excitation, natural and synthetic samples exhibit photoluminescence peaks at 693.3 nm and 694.7 nm with identical peak positions, but the photoluminescence intensity of synthetic samples is consistently lower than that of natural ones. Based on these findings, an identification protocol is proposed that integrates conventional instruments for preliminary screening, EDXRF and LA-ICP-MS trace element testing as the key technique, and Raman spectroscopy and photoluminescence (PL) intensity as auxiliary indicators, providing a systematic reference for the accurate identification of colourless sapphires.

     

/

返回文章
返回