WANG Guanyu, CHEN Tao. A Comparative Gemmological Study on Red Yuewei Stone and Laoling Stone from Shoushan, Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2016, 18(1): 15-23.
Citation: WANG Guanyu, CHEN Tao. A Comparative Gemmological Study on Red Yuewei Stone and Laoling Stone from Shoushan, Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2016, 18(1): 15-23.

A Comparative Gemmological Study on Red Yuewei Stone and Laoling Stone from Shoushan, Fujian Province

More Information
  • Received Date: October 03, 2015
  • Larderite is one of the most famous carving stones in China, which is widely rewarded and respected by all walks of life for its gorgeous colour and fine texture.With the ever-increasing demand of the larderite, extensive researches on its gemmological and mineralogical properties were carried out.
    This paper investigated two specific kinds of red larderite called Yuewei stone and Laoling stone on their gemmological and mineralogical properties, chemical compositions, mineral components and origin of colour by using conventional gemmological instruments, XRD, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy(FTIR), laser Raman spectroscopy and environmental scanning electron microscope(ESEM) with energy dispersive spectrometer(EDS).
    Differences exsit between Yuewei stone and Laoling stone in visual inspection.Compared with Laoling stone, Yuewei stone is lighter in colour, milder in luster and clearer in transparency.Bright red spots and dark red veins can be easily seen with naked eyes in Yuewei stone while only red veins in Laoling stone.Flash of cleavage plane can be seen in Yuewei stone which is then identified as diaspore in further study.While light yellow and yellowish white minor minerals can be seen in Laoling stone, which is later identified as rutile in further study.
    The major ingredient of both stones is pyrophyllite.Observed by microscope, it is colourless and the crystal is very tiny, with no apparent boundary, and its interference colour is secondary blue and green.Characteristic peaks at 9.132, 4.579, 2.295, 3.056 Å of pyrophyllite can be seen in XRD results.Detailed research shows that pyrophyllite in Yuewei stone is 2M1 type, while in Laoling stone a mix of 2M1 type and 1Tc type.
    IR spectra show that the spectra of both stones are similar, with 3 675cm-1 Al-(OH) stretching vibration, 1 122cm-1 Si-OH stretching vibration, 1 069cm-1 Si-O-Si stretching vibration, 949cm-1 Al-(OH) in-plane swing, 853, 835, 813cm-1 Al-(OH) out-ofplane swing and 540, 483, 418cm-1 Si-O swing.The result indicates that the major ingredient of both stones is pyrophyllite.Raman spectra show characteristic peaks at 195, 215, 262, 706, 814cm-1 indicating pyrophyllite.From the results of ESEM, major minerals are in imbricate arrangement, plate-type structure or fragmentary structure.The EDS test shows that the elementary composition is w(Al)=11%, w(Si)=24%, w(O)=65%, which is in line with Al2[Si4O10](OH)2.
    Apart from pyrophyllite, those diaspore and hematite were found in Yuewei stone, while hematite, rutile, zircon, muscovite and chlorite, in Laoling stone.In Yuewei stone, diaspore can be divided into two types, well-crystallized one and poorly crystallized one, additionally, hematite appears as spot or vein, quite small and poor crystallized.
    In Laoling stone, hematites are light brown, and some appear as spot or vein unevenly in pyrophyllite, some centre on rutile core, and some are well-crystallized as single crystal.Rutile is dark brown, darker than hematite, and appears as spot or needle.Around the spot ones, there are always hematite veins, and the needle ones are always arranged.Besides, some rutiles are colored dark green.Zircon always distributes at the edge of hematite and rutile.
  • [1]
    汤德平, 姚春茂, 解小建.一些寿山石新品种的宝石学研究[J].宝石和宝石学杂志, 2005, 7(4):1-6.
    [2]
    邹天人, 徐海明, 王军, 等.寿山石的品种简介[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2010, 29(S1):8-14.
    [3]
    LEE H T.A petrographical study of the Chinese agalmatolites[J].Bulletin of the Geological Society of China, 1928, 7(Z1):221-232.
    [4]
    杨雅秀."图章石"的主要矿物成分为迪开石类矿物非叶蜡石矿物[J].建材地质, 1995, 79(3):8-14.
    [5]
    汤德平, 郑宗坦.寿山石的矿物组成与宝石学研究[J].宝石和宝石学杂志, 1999, 1(4):28-36.
    [6]
    武新逢, 崔文元.寿山石的矿物学研究[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 1999, 18(2):186-192.
    [7]
    李玉娟.寿山石的矿物组分和特征[J].福建地质, 2005, 24(2):79-89.
    [8]
    刘卫东, 江国健, 徐家跃, 等.寿山石矿物组成及其分类的XRD研究[J].上海应用技术学院学报:自然科学版, 2009, 9(3):175-178.
    [9]
    邹天人, 郭立鹤, 徐文艺, 等.寿山石的矿物组分和田黄石的命名[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2010, 29(S1):30-33.
    [10]
    董晋琨.福建寿山石矿床的矿物学研究和成因分析[D].北京:中国地质大学, 2008.
    [11]
    常丽华, 陈曼云, 金巍, 等.透明矿物薄片鉴定手册[M].北京:地质出版社, 2006:116.
    [12]
    李文瑛.我国几个矿区叶蜡石X射线粉晶衍射研究[J].矿物学报, 1989, 9(4):378-382.
    [13]
    杨献忠, 黄光昭, 李佩玉, 等.寿山叶蜡石矿床中叶蜡石的多型及其转变[J].福建地质, 1993, 12(3):172-181.
    [14]
    杨雅秀, 张乃娴.中国粘土矿物[M].北京:地质出版社, 1994:57-75.
    [15]
    彭文世, 刘高魁.矿物红外光谱图集[M].北京:科学出版, 1982:381-422.
    [16]
    Farmer V C, Russell J D, Farmer V C, et al.Infrared absorption spectrometry in clay studies[J].Clays &Clay Minerals, 1967, 15(1):121-142.
    [17]
    Farmer V C.Infrared spectroscopy in clay mineral studies[J].Clay Minerals, 1968, 7(4):373-387.
    [18]
    闻辂, 卢奇勋, 袁顺生.矿物红外光谱学[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 1989:89-103.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (375) PDF downloads (29) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return