张荣红, 刘惠华, 张学云, 任开. 中西方首饰艺术教育模式比较与思考[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 2016, 18(5): 73-77.
引用本文: 张荣红, 刘惠华, 张学云, 任开. 中西方首饰艺术教育模式比较与思考[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 2016, 18(5): 73-77.
ZHANG Ronghong, LIU Huihua, ZHANG Xueyun, REN Kai. Thought on Comparison of Jewelry Education Model from Chinese and Western Art[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2016, 18(5): 73-77.
Citation: ZHANG Ronghong, LIU Huihua, ZHANG Xueyun, REN Kai. Thought on Comparison of Jewelry Education Model from Chinese and Western Art[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2016, 18(5): 73-77.

中西方首饰艺术教育模式比较与思考

Thought on Comparison of Jewelry Education Model from Chinese and Western Art

  • 摘要: 基于创新性设计人才培养的目的,对中西方现代首饰艺术教育进行了比较与探讨。首先介绍了西方首饰艺术教育的特点:思维的开放性和个人学习思考的主动性、技法学习融于创作,以及理论学习等;中国首饰艺术教育起步晚,发展快,不同高校的首饰艺术教育定位和模式不同,有的注重概念和思维的拓展,有的强调手工技法的训练,有的与市场的商业性紧密结合。根据包豪斯的艺术教育理论,作为创新人才培养的对象,学生需要创意的自由和技法能力的扎实掌握。因此,学生自由选择艺术或商业、手工或科技的创作形式,使其创作思想突破封闭的空间激情飞扬,这才是现代创新人才培养的目的。

     

    Abstract: In this paper, the Chinese and western modern jewelry art education with the purpose of cultivating creative talents was compared and discussed. It introduced the features of western jewelry education: Openness of thought and taking initiative of individual, the learning of techniques merged into the creation and the learning of theory. Furthermore, it described that Chinese jewelry education starts late, but it develops fast. And different colleges and universities have different orientations and models in jewelry education, such as the development of concept and thought, the manual skill training and the commercial market. According to Bauhaus' theory in art education, the subjects as cultivated creative talents should have the creative freedom and solid grasp of technical ability. Hence, the author considered that the subjects freely choose kinds of creative forms as well as art, commerce, manual work or technique, and their creative ideas are more broad, which is the purpose of cultivating creative talents.

     

/

返回文章
返回