董俊卿, 干福熹, 李青会, 顾冬红, 阚绪杭, 程永建. 我国古代两种珍稀宝玉石文物分析[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 2011, 13(3): 46-52.
引用本文: 董俊卿, 干福熹, 李青会, 顾冬红, 阚绪杭, 程永建. 我国古代两种珍稀宝玉石文物分析[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 2011, 13(3): 46-52.
DONGJun-qing, GAN Fu-xi, LI Qing-hui, Gu Dong-hong, KANG Xu-hang, CHENG Yong-jian. An Analysis of Two Ancient Precious Gems Cultural Relics[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2011, 13(3): 46-52.
Citation: DONGJun-qing, GAN Fu-xi, LI Qing-hui, Gu Dong-hong, KANG Xu-hang, CHENG Yong-jian. An Analysis of Two Ancient Precious Gems Cultural Relics[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2011, 13(3): 46-52.

我国古代两种珍稀宝玉石文物分析

An Analysis of Two Ancient Precious Gems Cultural Relics

  • 摘要: 为了科学辨别易混淆文物的材质, 以蓝绿色和蓝紫色宝玉石文物为例, 利用外束质子激发X射线荧光、便携式能量色散X射线荧光、激光拉曼光谱和X射线衍射分析等现代无损科技手段, 从安徽蚌埠双墩一号春秋墓、河南洛阳烧沟东汉墓和新疆和田皮山古城唐代墓葬中甄别与鉴定出被误认为是绿松石和琉璃(玻璃)器的天河石串珠和青金石耳珰及青金石管饰。简要阐述了这两种彩色宝玉石的矿物学特征及应用历史。这三件彩色宝玉石文物的发现, 丰富了中国宝玉石史的研究内容, 拓宽了对我国古代先民开采、引进及应用宝玉石的认识。

     

    Abstract: For the purpose of distinguishing the materials of confusable cultural relics scientifically, take the case of glaucous and ianthinus gems cultural relics, the amazonite bead, lapis lazuli earring and tube, erroneously assumed to be turquoise and coloured glaze, were respectively discriminated and identified from Shuangdun No.1 Tomb of Spring and Autumn Period in Bengbu, Anhui Province, Eastern Han Tomb in Shaogou, Luoyang, Henan Province, and Tang Tomb in Pishan Ancient City, Hetian, Xinjiang by using the modern nondestructive analytical methods, such as external beam proton induced X-ray emission(PIXE), portable energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence(PXRF), laser Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction(XRD)analysis.Meanwhile, the mineralogical characteristics and application history of the two gems are also briefly described.The discovery of the three ancient gems cultural relics enriches the research contents of Chinese gems history, and broadens our understanding of our ancestors'mining, importing and using of gems.

     

/

返回文章
返回