陈琼, 周征宇, 姚春茂, 袁媛, 支颖雪. 三种仿寿山“坑头冻”印材的宝石矿物学特征[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 2012, 14(1): 7-13.
引用本文: 陈琼, 周征宇, 姚春茂, 袁媛, 支颖雪. 三种仿寿山“坑头冻”印材的宝石矿物学特征[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 2012, 14(1): 7-13.
CHEN Qiong, ZHOU Zheng-yu, YAO Chun-mao, YUAN Yuan, ZHI Ying-xue. Gemmological and Mineralogical Characteristics of Three Seal Stones that Imitate Shoushan“Kengtoudong”[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2012, 14(1): 7-13.
Citation: CHEN Qiong, ZHOU Zheng-yu, YAO Chun-mao, YUAN Yuan, ZHI Ying-xue. Gemmological and Mineralogical Characteristics of Three Seal Stones that Imitate Shoushan“Kengtoudong”[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2012, 14(1): 7-13.

三种仿寿山“坑头冻”印材的宝石矿物学特征

Gemmological and Mineralogical Characteristics of Three Seal Stones that Imitate Shoushan“Kengtoudong”

  • 摘要: 寿山水坑石十分稀罕且昂贵,“坑头冻”乃其典型品种。采用XRD,FTIR,ICP-MS,SEM等测试仪器对目前市场上出现的仿寿山“坑头冻”的“青海白”“丹东白”“岩门晶”三种印材的矿物组成、化学成分以及微观结构进行了研究,并与寿山“坑头冻”进行了对比分析。结果表明,“坑头冻”由地开石组成,具特征的“萝卜丝纹”,质量分数中较高的Fe可能由黄铁矿包裹体所致;“青海白”主要矿物组成为石膏,硬度较低;“丹东白”主要矿物组成为斜绿泥石,其灰蒙蒙状外观由墨绿色斑点状杂质所致;“岩门晶”主要由地开石组成,具较高质量分数的V,Cr元素可能是其总带有浅黄绿色调的原因。SEM的观察结果发现,“坑头冻”晶体的结晶程度好,呈假六方片状结构;“青海白”的板状石膏晶体粒度大、厚度大,堆积不紧密,易与其它三者区分;“丹东白”中的斜绿泥石片晶薄且堆积紧密,挠性发育,手感滑快;“岩门晶”与“坑头冻”的特征较为相似,但前者的结晶程度稍低。“坑头冻”“青海白”“丹东白”“岩门晶”在矿物组成、化学成分及显微结构上的差异以及在颜色、光泽、密度、包裹体等方面存在的不少差异,可作为四者的鉴别特征。

     

    Abstract: Shoushan“Kengtoudong”is a typical stone of Shoushan puddle stone which is rare and expensive.By XRD,FTIR,ICP-MS,SEM and other instruments,mineral component,chemical composition,microstructure of“Qinghaibai”“Dandongbai”and“Yanmenjing”are investigated systematically when they appear on the market recently as the imitation of Shoushan“Kengtoudong”.The results show that“Kengtoudong”is mainly composed of dickite,observed with typical“Luobosiwen”,and a higher percentage of Fe in chemical composition might result from its pyrite inclusions.“Qinghaibai”is mainly composed of gypsum,which is of lower hardness.“Dandongbai”is mainly composed of clinochlore,and dark green speckle impurities lead to dusky appearance.“Yanmenjing”is mainly composed of dickite and higher V and Cr might be the reason that the stone show limegreen tones.SEM observation shows that Shoushan“Kengtoudong”samples have a high degree of crystallization with false hexagonal flake structure.The crystals plate of“Qinghaibai”is of large granularity,thickness and loose accumulation,thus it can be easily distinguished from others.The lamellar crystal of clinochlore of“Dandongbai”is thin and piled up closely,flex developed,thus it is smooth to the touch.The microscopical features of“Yanmenjing”are much like Shoushan“Kengtoudong”,but its crystal degree is a little lower.The stones mentioned above are different in colour,luster,weighting and inclusions,due to their different mineral components and chemical compositions.

     

/

返回文章
返回