钟华邦. 中国古代“玉石之路”的质疑[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 2014, 16(3): 75-77.
引用本文: 钟华邦. 中国古代“玉石之路”的质疑[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 2014, 16(3): 75-77.
ZHONG Huabang. Doubt on “Jade Road” of Ancient China[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2014, 16(3): 75-77.
Citation: ZHONG Huabang. Doubt on “Jade Road” of Ancient China[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2014, 16(3): 75-77.

中国古代“玉石之路”的质疑

Doubt on “Jade Road” of Ancient China

  • 摘要: 我国在汉代以后便出现了丝绸之路。丝绸之路不仅是中国联系东西方的“国道”,也是整个古代中外经济及文化交流的通道。许多学者、教授、专家认为良渚文化遗址出土的玉器、殷商文化遗址出土的玉器等文物,其玉石原料是新疆和田玉经过“玉石之路”被远途运输到中原内地来的。改革开放后在长江三角洲地区发现了江苏梅岭玉,现在的研究证明良渚文化遗址出土的玉器、殷商文化遗址出土的玉器的原料不是来自新疆和田。因此,笔者对中国古代“玉石之路”提出了质疑。

     

    Abstract: The Silk Road was formed after Han dynasty in China,which was an important international channel to communicate with the western countries in many aspects such as economy and culture.Many specialists believe that the jade unearthed in the site of Liangzhu culture and Yinshang culture was imported through the“Jade Road”from Hetian in Xinjiang. After reforming and opening up in China,jade from Meiling has been discovered in Jiangsu Province.It is proved that the jade from the site of Liangzhu culture and Yinshang culture is not the Hetian Yu from Xinjiang.In the paper,the author has a doubt on the ancient“Jade Road”.

     

/

返回文章
返回