赖舒琪, 丘志力, 杨炯, 罗涵, 郑昕雨, 叶旭. 古代青金石的开采和贸易:基于历史文献及考古发现二重证据的研究进展[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志(中英文), 2021, 23(4): 1-11. DOI: 10.15964/j.cnki.027jgg.2021.04.001
引用本文: 赖舒琪, 丘志力, 杨炯, 罗涵, 郑昕雨, 叶旭. 古代青金石的开采和贸易:基于历史文献及考古发现二重证据的研究进展[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志(中英文), 2021, 23(4): 1-11. DOI: 10.15964/j.cnki.027jgg.2021.04.001
LAI Shuqi, QIU Zhili, YANG Jiong, LUO Han, ZHENG Xinyu, YE Xu. Mining and Trading of Ancient Lapis Lazuli: The Exploration for A Combination of Twofold Evidence Based on Historical Documents and Archaeology Discovery[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2021, 23(4): 1-11. DOI: 10.15964/j.cnki.027jgg.2021.04.001
Citation: LAI Shuqi, QIU Zhili, YANG Jiong, LUO Han, ZHENG Xinyu, YE Xu. Mining and Trading of Ancient Lapis Lazuli: The Exploration for A Combination of Twofold Evidence Based on Historical Documents and Archaeology Discovery[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2021, 23(4): 1-11. DOI: 10.15964/j.cnki.027jgg.2021.04.001

古代青金石的开采和贸易:基于历史文献及考古发现二重证据的研究进展

Mining and Trading of Ancient Lapis Lazuli: The Exploration for A Combination of Twofold Evidence Based on Historical Documents and Archaeology Discovery

  • 摘要: 具有浓烈的帝青色的青金石在美索不达米亚、古埃及、古罗马、古印度、古中国等多个早期古代文明发源地均有所使用,但因为产地的缺乏以及考古材料的约束,国内对青金石产地源流、贸易及文化交流的认知仍较为局限。本文基于国内外文献及考古发现的研究成果,对青金石的开采、贸易及使用进行了系统的梳理分析,为国内开展青金石宝石学与考古学等学科交叉研究提供参考。综合获得以下主要认识:(1)虽然考古发现仍然无法解释部分遗址出土青金石的来源,但地质及考古学证据表明,阿富汗是最重要的古青金石产地;(2)早至4500 B.C.,青金石的贸易活动已有明确的组织,不同时段(4500 B.C.-3500 B.C., 3500 B.C.-1000 B.C.和1000 B.C.-公元初期)可以追溯出三条不同的贸易和运输路线,早期以陆运及河运为主,中期海运发展迅速,晚期则是三者的密切结合,路线变迁受地理环境、城市兴衰、民众需求等多因素控制;(3)考古研究及文献记载显示,古代青金石的用途及角色发生过显著改变,世界各地域古文化的差异使神圣化后的青金石的使用呈现多种表现形式,同时展现出古人对青金石颜色色彩认知的多元性。国际学术界对青金石材料资源开发、贸易及使用的研究可以为我们探索中国古代早期玉石开发及流通提供重要的借鉴。

     

    Abstract: Lapis lazuli with a vivid and bright imperial blue colour was used widely in Mesopotamia, ancient Egypt, ancient India, ancient Rome, ancient China and other early ancient civilizations. However, due to the lack of producing areas and the constraints of archaeological materials, the domestic understanding of the origin, trade and cultural exchange of lapis lazis is still relatively limited. Based on the research at home and abroad, this study aimed to systematically sorting and summarizing the previous results of exploitation, trade route and employment of lapis lazuli, which provides reference for the interdisciplinary research of gemmology, archaeology, and other disciplines. The main results were summarized as follows: (1) Although archaeological findings still can not explain the origin of lapis lazuli found at some sites, geological and archaeological evidences suggest that Afghanistan is the most important source of lapis lazuli; (2) As early as 4500 B.C., the trade of lapis lazuli was well-organized, and three different trade and transportation routes in different time periods (4500 B.C.-3500 B.C., 3500 B.C.-1000 B.C. and 1000 B.C.-early A.D.) can be traced back. In the early stage, land and river transportation were the primary, in the medium-stage, sea transportation developed rapidly, and in the late stage, these three routes were closely combined. Route changes were controlled by multiple factors such as geographical environment, urban rise and fall, and the public demand; (3) Archaeological studies and literature records showed that the use and role of ancient lapis lazuli have changed significantly. The worldwide urban cultural diversification have made the sanctified lapis lazuli present a variety forms of use, and simultaneously it shows ancient people's multifarious cognition on the colour of lapis lazuli. The researches of lapis lazuli material resource exploitation, trading and uses in international academia can provide us important reference to explore the development and circulation of jade in early ancient China.

     

/

返回文章
返回