国内宝石学科研究热点及趋势探讨——基于《宝石和宝石学杂志(中英文)》的知识图谱分析
Analysis of Domestic Research Hotspots and Trends of Gemstone Discipline in China:Knowledge Mapping Analysis Based on the Data Cited from Journal of Gems & Gemmology
-
摘要: 文章采用文献计量法, 以1999年至2019年期间中国学术期刊网络出版总库(CNKI)收录的1 362篇刊发在《宝石和宝石学杂志(中英文)》上的期刊论文为研究对象, 运用知识网络分析工具从时空分布、关键词聚类、热点词突显方面, 绘制国内宝石学研究知识图谱, 得到国内宝石学科研究热点及趋势为:(1)宝石学科属于易于与其他学科发生交叉融合的“弹性学科”, 但目前国内的宝石学研究方向纷杂, 聚焦性不足; (2)国内宝石领域的研究机构之间的合作不紧密; (3)研究者对同一课题的深入研究的持续动力不足; (4)国内宝石学领域研究论文的热点仍聚焦在与地质学相关的传统研究方向, 新发展的学科方向的理论支撑不足, 缺乏研究的系统性和深度。文章探讨宝石学科发展演进, 旨在为其在高校双一流建设和行业发展双重背景下的发展提供数据参考。Abstract: A knowledge mapping analysis was applied to 1 362 papers published in the Journal of Gems & Gemmology from 1999 to 2019 by adoption of sofewares such as Excel and Citespace via statistical methods. The cluster research results draw the domestic gemmology research knowledge map from the aspects of spatial and temporal distribution, keyword clustering and hotspots highlighting. The research indicates that the domestic gemmology research hotspots and research trends are as follows: (1) Gemmology discipline is a "flexible discipline" which is easy to cross and integrate with other disciplines. However, the current domestic gemmological research interests are diverse and not concentrate; (2) the cooperation between domestic gem research institutions is loose; (3) researchers' continuous motivation focus on the research subject is insufficient; (4) the hotspots of domestic gemmology research papers are still focused on the traditional research directions related to geology while the newly developed discipline direction is insufficient in theory support and lacks of systematic and in-depth research. This paper discusses the development and evolution of gemstone discipline, aiming to provide data reference for its development under the background of double first-class construction in colleges and universities and industry development.