Radek Hanus, Jaroslav Hyršl. “合成”莫尔道玻陨石和天然莫尔道玻陨石的鉴别[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 2018, 20(1): 14-25. DOI: 10.15964/j.cnki.027jgg.2018.01.002
引用本文: Radek Hanus, Jaroslav Hyršl. “合成”莫尔道玻陨石和天然莫尔道玻陨石的鉴别[J]. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 2018, 20(1): 14-25. DOI: 10.15964/j.cnki.027jgg.2018.01.002
Radek Hanus, Jaroslav Hyršl. Distinguishing “Synthetic” and Natural Moldavite[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2018, 20(1): 14-25. DOI: 10.15964/j.cnki.027jgg.2018.01.002
Citation: Radek Hanus, Jaroslav Hyršl. Distinguishing “Synthetic” and Natural Moldavite[J]. Journal of Gems & Gemmology, 2018, 20(1): 14-25. DOI: 10.15964/j.cnki.027jgg.2018.01.002

“合成”莫尔道玻陨石和天然莫尔道玻陨石的鉴别

Distinguishing “Synthetic” and Natural Moldavite

  • 摘要: 近期,在宝石市场上出现了大量的合成莫尔道玻陨石。天然莫尔道玻陨石属于玻璃陨石的一种,由撞击地球表面的大陨石而形成。巨大的冲击能量至少可达到8 km/s,引起陨石坑基岩(所谓的陨星坑)气化和熔化,并使得一部分物质进入到大气层上层(部分甚至进入到太空),最后在数百公里外落下。最初的莫尔道玻陨石坑位于德国Stuttgart附近的Nördlingen ,然而在捷克共和国South Bohemia的玻陨石散布地区有300~400公里,其南部摩拉维亚很少有发现。与天然莫尔道玻陨石相比,大部分合成莫尔道玻陨石有着异常的高光泽。天然莫尔道玻陨石通常有一个非常尖锐的表面(尤其是来自砂沉积物),与此相反,经过了水流搬运,莫尔道玻陨石表面变得光滑。合成莫尔道玻陨石边缘常常是光滑的,表面的光泽变得更强(通过酸洗)或者更弱。合成莫尔道玻陨石可以由多种方式雕刻,最好的方法之一就是像天然莫尔道玻陨石一样,在氢氟酸中选择性溶解。不同的是在天然莫尔道玻陨石中有焦石英的存在。焦石英常在天然莫尔道玻陨石表面较为突出(用放大镜容易看到),即使切磨好的宝石也可以看到。如果在有争议的情况下,Raman光谱仪或者UV-Vis光谱能被用以区分天然和合成莫尔道玻陨石。合成莫尔道玻陨石在长波紫外荧光(366 nm)特征是具有象征意义的,相反,天然莫尔道玻陨石在此长波紫外下完全惰性。总体上,本文的测试结果显示合成和天然莫尔道玻陨石是完全不同的。

     

    Abstract: A significant amount of synthetic moldavites has recently appeared on the precious stones market. Moldavites belong to a large group of tektites-material formed by large meteorites impacting the earth surface. Enormous energy of impact at a speed of minimum 8 km/s caused gasification and melting of the meteorite crater rock basement (so called astrobleme) and especially blowing out a part of the mass into the upper parts of the atmosphere (partly even into the space) and falling back hundreds of kilometres away. The original moldavites crater is by Nördlingen near Stuttgart in Germany, whereas the strewn field is about 300-400 km far in South Bohemia in the Czech Republic, rarely in Moravia. Most synthetic moldavites have unusually high lustre in comparison with natural moldavites. Natural moldavites normally have a very sharp surface (especially those originating from sand sediments). On the contrary, moldavites after water transport have smoothed surface. Edges between the sculptation projections in case of synthetic moldavites are often partly smoothed and the surface is markedly more lustrous (lustre obtained from the acid) or, by contrast, notably duller. Sculptation on synthetic moldavites was created by several methods. The best one, i.e. most resembling natural moldavites, is sculptation caused by selective dissolving in hydrofluoric acid. An ideal distinguishing mark is presence of lechatelierite in natural moldavites. Lechatelierites often project from the surface of natural moldavites (well visible with a magnifier or microscope), and in cut stones, these can also be seen with a magnifier or microscope. In disputable cases, Raman or UV-Vis spectrometry can be used. Fluorescence of synthetic moldavites in long-wave UV (366 nm) is also significant. On the contrary, natural moldavites are completely inert. Measurements results of synthetic and natural moldavites are sufficiently different.

     

/

返回文章
返回